Opinion: Anti-abortion politicians are dangerous; religious bias | Opinion
On March 11 of this year, Governor Greg Abbott of Texas introduced Senate Bill 8, the âTexas Heartbeat Actâ. The law was promulgated on May 19 and entered into force on September 1. As the strictest abortion law in the country, this law allows individuals to prosecute anyone who violates the ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, when a heartbeat is first detected.
The law does not allow exceptions for rape or incest, and offenders can be prosecuted for a minimum of $ 10,000. In addition, medical and legal experts largely believe that the six-week deadline the fetal heartbeat is misleading. Embryos do not have a heart at this stage of development, so the sound heard on ultrasound machines is simply the electrical activity of cells, not the “opening and closing of heart valves” heard in adults. .
This is just one of many examples of anti-abortion politicians putting religious fervor above medical knowledge and the well-being of pregnant women. For an ideology that claims personal freedom, many conservative figures can’t seem to keep religion out of their rhetoric when talking about abortion.
In a video of the bill signing ceremony posted on his Twitter account, Governor Abbott attempted to justify the Texas Heartbeat Act by saying that “our creator endowed us with the right to life.”
This “Creator” most likely refers to a higher entity in the Christian religion, and Abbott’s inclusion of this type of sentiment in his political arguments and political decisions directly violates the separation of church and state.
In May 2019, when Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed another anti-abortion bill, she said the bill reflects the state’s belief that “every life is a sacred gift from God.References to a higher entity, once again, are stark proof that anti-abortion politicians do not base their decisions on sound scientific reasoning.
Senator John Milkovich, who introduced one of Louisiana’s toughest abortion laws, said a 15-week ban in Louisiana would protect fetuses from pain, even if it is medically unproven that fetuses can experience pain at this stage of gestation.
Conservative and anti-abortion politicians are rife in the Deep South, and they are more than an embarrassment to the country; they pose a dangerous threat to the health and safety of pregnant women in a region where access to abortion is already scarce.
Louisiana itself has only three abortion clinics throughout the state. With the influx of Texas patients needing abortions after Senate Bill 8 came into effect, facilities are overwhelmed and waiting lists are long, which, needless to say, is troubling for an urgent procedure such as an abortion.
Louisiana may soon face even more severe restrictions. A Mississippi ban on abortions after 15 weeks will be appear in Supreme Court on December 1, and a decision in favor of the ban could have national implications on pre-viable abortions. The result of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decides on the constitutionality of abortion laws such as that proposed by Senator Milkovich.
Abortions are going to happen, whether they are legal or not; countries that have banned abortion have about the same number abortions as a country where it is legal.
Anti-abortion laws will not prevent abortions in the United States. What they will do, however, is increase the number of pregnancy-related deaths and intensify the stress and trauma that accompany an unwanted pregnancy.
If research shows that banning abortions will not reduce the number of abortions performed and instead will only decrease safe abortions, then the intentions of anti-abortion politicians are clear: these laws are not proposed to preserve ” life “. They are only offered to restrain the body of pregnant women.
To prevent abortions, focus less on promoting laws that increase pregnancy-related deaths and focus more on improving access to birth control and sex education.
Kathryn Craddock is a 21-year-old mass communication girl from Patterson, Louisiana.